It’s no big deal, but on a day I finished clearing out this year’s compost bin and spreading it across the entire vegetable garden [no digging this time around, so that annual commitment gone – as much as I looked forward to the triumph of its finish] I turned my attention and self-animation to this ercol advertisement in yesterday’s Observer.

The errors in it prompted a number of feelings/responses. The first is the glaring mistake of not putting a dash or colon or connective after the word ‘chairs’ and therefore before ‘receive’. Related to this was my tangential thought that students wouldn’t need to know how to name this mistake, in punctuation or grammatical terms, especially at English Key Stages 1 and 2 [linking to a long-standing argument of mine, and others, as an English teacher], but I’d like them to see it as a mistake. Now, for a national advertisement, this kind of technical error is surely ridiculous – just because it is wrong – but presumably money was paid to proof-read? But what genuinely prompted this animation [yes, more than pedantry!] was the insulting nature of the FREE offer: the cheapest chair!

Naturally, on the basis of the outrageous affront of that offer I have considered if this is entirely stylised, so including this and the other errors I will also highlight. Perhaps an intentional sassiness? But I think not.

These next are probably not sacrosanct, and interpretable again as fashion/style, but I’m not convinced that dining, living, bedroom, and home office are proper nouns. They are common nouns, to get technical. This is especially significant if home office is meant to be domestic rather than an institution. And the &?

With ‘Offer ends Monday 5^th November 2018’ you suspect punctuation is a non-consideration. As for ‘Terms and conditions apply, ask in store for details.’ you know punctuation is considered, just randomly and inaccurately! The comma after ‘apply’ is interesting because it is a partial recognition of a need that isn’t seen in my opening example, just that again it is wrong and should be a dash or colon. And then there is the last line of the above capture which is just obviously the samo-samo….

As for the lower case brand name: well, that’s conventionally acceptable as style, but this speaks more to a casualness that smacks of uncaring. But it is essentially the cheap-ass offer of a free cheapest chair that galls. Really. And the fact I have no garden to dig and occupy a wandering mind.

NB I’ve just re-read what I have written, a few hours subsequent. Yeah, I’d be worried if I didn’t know the person who wrote this! So, a picture of my composted garden just as a kind of context to explain the loose end leading to my purism: